All posts by Marc Klaas

I am President of the KlaasKids Foundation and BeyondMissing, Inc. Both organizations are 501(c)(3) public benefit non profit organizations.

Shame on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

trucks_18_wheeler_peterbilt_automotive_m29839As one of numerous child safety advocates across the country, I am extremely saddened and disappointed with the FCC’s astonishingly insensitive action this week preventing hundreds of thousands of truck drivers from becoming critical first responders in the search for missing and abducted children and adults.

I could not be more disappointed in the FCC for failing to acknowledge the vast contribution that America’s 2.5 million strong trucking community provides to our great nation by providing them with a basic service that would have ultimately benefited our entire country.

We frankly disagree with the FCC, as do the more than 50,000 truck drivers and public safety advocates who wrote to the Commission regarding the public interest benefits of our proposal. Ultimately, the FCC has missed an opportunity to save lives.

Twenty years ago, my daughter Polly was kidnapped, but the long-haul trucker community was there to help circulate flyers far and wide. We rapidly realized that truckers are out there on the roads and at highway rest stops, convenience stores, gas stations, and fast food restaurants where persons on the run frequently try to escape. It’s still a fact that there are thousands of truckers in rural America who cannot access basic TV at truck stops across the country – for 10 hours or more per day their cabs are their living rooms on the road.

Clarity Media found a way to serve the trucking community so it could enjoy — at an affordable rate — the high-quality television services the rest of society takes for granted. Yet the FCC ignored compelling arguments, multiple tests and benefits to the trucking community as well as missing children.

Clarity’s proposal included a Public Safety and Alert channel that would have allowed truckers to receive news flashes, special reports, and full-length programming about unresolved missing person cases from local television stations, national cable and satellite channels, and Clarity channels. And in addition to high-profile cases, the service would have also featured lower-profile cases that may have failed to receive media attention, including missing adults excluded by their age from the Amber Alert system.

The FCC’s decision means a lot of underserved and underprivileged truck drivers won’t be able to assist the families and law enforcement officials who so desperately need their help. We hope the Commission will soon realize how its decision adversely affects cases involving missing and abducted children. We plan to continue our fight and urge the public to join us.

Global Positioning Systems (GPS) & Child Protection

The concept of a Child Locator GPS device first came to my attention in the aftermath of my daughter Polly’s 1993 tragedy. The main obstacle at that time was the same one that exists today: battery life.

Currently, there are 32-GPS satellites orbiting the earth. The satellites, operated by the US Department of Defense, orbit with a period of 12 hours (2-orbits/day) at a height of about 11,500 miles traveling at 9,000 mph. Each GPS satellite is constantly transmitting its precise location back to earth. GPS receivers take this locator information from individual GPS satellites and use triangulation to calculate the GPS receiver’s exact location. Triangulation is a way of determining something’s location using the locations of other things, in this case line of sight GPS satellites orbiting the earth. In order to facilitate current location updates any GPS device requires a constant power source.

There are plenty of Child Locator GPS devices on the market. One popular way to go is to simply purchase the Family Locator option from you cell phone provider (ATT, Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile). For a very reasonable price you are able to track up to 10-GPS equipped cell phones. All cell phones in use are GPS equipped. Typically, child locator services allow you to pinpoint the device at pre-determined intervals (breadcrumbs), create inclusion zones that notify you if the device leaves a specific radius (geo-fencing), allow you to follow progress in a vehicle and notes how fast the vehicle is travelling, and has a panic button children can press if threatened.

Another popular option is to purchase a stand-alone Child Locator GPS device. Smaller than cell phones, but not as versatile, these devices can be placed in backpacks, in pockets, etc. Some of these devices have the added feature of providing location service for registered sex offenders in your immediate vicinity.

Like cell phone child locator services, stand-alone products require a monthly data plan to access services. In both instances the device battery must be recharged regularly: at least once per day. One can access, set and observe location services via online mapping programs.1The problem with this approach is that it is the device that is being tracked, not the child. The KlaasKids Foundation is currently involved in the case of a teenager, who disappeared in March, 2012. Her GPS enabled cell phone was located two days after she disappeared, but Sierra LaMar remains missing to this day.

The trick then, is to create a product with sufficient battery life to keep the device constantly running, that stays with the child at all times. Battery technology is not sufficiently advanced to make jewelry a viable option. Even larger items like belt buckles are problematic at this time. However, there is a company that will soon be producing a wristwatch with extended battery life, and titanium infused wristbands designed so that they can only be removed by a unique key fob that remains with the parents.

Before I finish, I would like to address the elephant in the room. Many people are under the misconception that an implantable chip exists that will perform most of the functions previously discussed. Unfortunately, this is not the case. These well-meaning, but misguided folks argue that we have been utilizing this kind of technology to track pets and other wild life for decades now. In truth, a microchip implant is an identifying integrated circuit placed under the skin of a dog, cat or other animal. The chip, about the size of a grain of rice, uses passive RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology.

Technology is coming ever closer to the dream of a GPS device that will perform multiple functions, stay with the child and ultimately dissuade perverts from grabbing our kids. Until that day arrives, our best options are Cell Phone Locator Services and Stand Alone GPS Devices.

New FBI Report Shows Disturbing Increase in California Crime

By Michael Rushford

A report released last week by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, documenting crime statistics in larger U. S. cities over 2012, provides more evidence that crime in California is increasing under Governor Jerry Brown’s Realignment law (AB109) according to the California-based Criminal Justice Legal Foundation (CJLF).  The Foundation, which has been monitoring crime across the state since Realignment took effect in October 2011, cites data showing that while nationally both property crime and violent crime either increased slightly or decreased, in California all categories of crime increased, some at several times the national rate.

While these statistics only document the first full year under the new law, which reduced the sentences and shifted responsibility for tens of thousands of habitual felons from the state to California counties, they indicate sharp increases in most crimes after decades of steady reductions.

“Between 1993 and 2011, violent crime dropped every year but 2006, when it increased by 1.2%.  Last year violent crime in California went up 2.9%, more than twice the rate of the rest of the country.” According to CJLF analysis, “Murders in California increased by 10.5%, while the nation as a whole saw a 1.5% rise.”

The Foundation also cites FBI statistics showing that, while rapes were down nationally, they increased by 6.4% in California.  Property crimes also dropped nationally in 2012, but increased in California by 9.7%.  The disparity in auto theft was even more dramatic.  California saw a 15% increase, while the national rate increased by 1.3%.

Supporters of Realignment initially promised that crime would not increase under the new law, and later characterized local reports of rising crime in many parts of the state as “alarmist” and “fear mongering.”  The Foundation suggests that this second FBI report, showing increased crime in California, bears out the concerns expressed by numerous police chiefs, sheriffs, and prosecutors that Realignment would jeopardize public safety.

For decades the state legislature ignored its responsibility to upgrade our aging prisons and address overcrowding.  This continued until two years ago when the courts finally ordered California to deal with the problem. The solution the Governor and the Legislature came up with was to dump tens of thousands of habitual criminals into the state’s cash-strapped counties and leave them there until they commit rape or murder.  Is anybody really surprised that this would result in increased crime?

The Stink Test!

APTOPIX Boyfriend SlayingDuring her closing argument during the penalty phase of the Jodi Arias trial defense attorney Jennifer Willmott said, “The simple question that’s before you is, do you kill her? That’s the question … It is an awful, awful thing that she did, but your conviction of first-degree murder is how [Alexander’s family] will get peace … We are asking you to find mercy.”

The penalty phase of a capital murder trial is not about killing an individual who has been found guilty of first degree murder and it is not about retribution. It is about following the law to reach an appropriate punishment for heinous crime based on evidence, mitigating and aggravating factors.

Nobody is asking the jury to kill Jodi Arias. Instead, the state is asking the jury to punish Jodi Arias for the atrocious crimes she committed against Travis Alexander. Their decision should be based on their interpretation of the evidence presented at trial and the jury instructions provided by the judge. It should not be based on mercy: particularly the very mercy that Arias denied her victim. The appropriate and legal punishment based upon Arias’ conviction of first degree murder with special circumstances is: the death penalty; life without the possibility of parole; or a life sentence with the possibility of parole after twenty-five years.

“Jodi took Travis away. She took him away from his family and she took him away from this world, but two wrongs do not make a right … You have a choice … We are asking you to find that Jodi’s life is worth saving,”

What is the second “wrong” that Willmott is referencing? The death penalty is legal punishment in Arizona and it is supported by a majority of the citizens of Arizona. Perhaps she is suggesting that the law of the land and the will of the people are wrong, and that her skewed philosophical point of view is somehow superior and correct.

How dare Jennifer Willmott invoke the name of Alexander’s family in her plea for mercy! The jury rejected character assassination as a defense tactic when Arias was found guilty of first degree murder. That should have been a clear signal to Arias and her defense team that Travis’ character and family are off limits as defense tactics moving forward. Ms. Willmott’s argument was as tone deaf as it was offensive.

Jodi Arias: Endgame

Travis Alexander

Travis Alexander

This morning the jury will recommend to the court whether Jodi Arias should spend the rest of her life in prison without the possibility of parole, or be executed for murdering Travis Alexander. Before that happens Alexander’s family will hear Arias address the jury and the Court. It will be her last opportunity to sway the jury before the sentence is handed down.

Some say that everything rides on what Arias says. Will she be defiant and stand by her declaration that she should be executed, or will she fall on her knees and beg the court for mercy? I doubt that there is anything she can say that will sway the jury. I have no doubt that Travis’ family wants the death sentence imposed, and her execution carried out as soon as possible.

Travis’ family has been in the courtroom since the day the trial started in January. They have remained stoic and dignified despite the daily onslaught of horrific revelations. If it wasn’t gruesome crime scene photographs, or vivid expert testimony, it was Arias and her team assassinating Travis character.

In her description of the crime Travis was the aggressor: on the verge of killing poor Jodi. She says that self-defense was her only recourse. Minutes later Travis lay slumped in his shower. He had been stabbed twenty-seven times, his throat had been slit from ear to ear, and he had been shot in the head. Arias emerged from the death match without a scratch.

When Arias called Travis a pedophile, all her family could do was grip their chairs, grit their teeth and stare straight ahead. There was no evidence to confirm her contention that Travis beat her. When the verdict was read the so-called abuse victim who held Travis’ perverted secret was finally exposed as nothing more than a psychopathic savage willing to engage in character assassination to make her case.

And now, we await the endgame. Whatever happens, Arias will eventually slip from the public consciousness as did Casey Anthony before her. However, Travis family has images and testimony seared into their brains that will remain forevermore. So, how should they respond?

My advice, and I went through a similar ordeal back in the day, is to find a way to put Arias behind them. Do not let them continue to dominate their lives. She has held sway for nearly five years now, since the day that she slaughtered their beloved Travis. She ruined his life, don’t let her ruin yours as well. She is going to spend the rest of her miserable life in prison. She will either die from natural causes or the executioner’s needle. Her influence should end the minute the warden closes the bars behind her. Do something to honor Travis memory. Create a foundation, a scholarship or even plant a tree in his honor. It is what he would have wanted.

Embrace your anger. It can be overwhelming, but it need not be destructive. Anger fueled me for years after Polly was murdered. It drove me onto the national stage where I was able to lobby for laws, concepts, and a national child safety agenda. Because of the work that I and others did we accomplished many good things. Every law enforcement agency in America now has a missing child protocol when before none existed. Megan’s Law requires the states to register convicted sex offenders and provide the community with a means of knowing who and where they are. In 1993, nobody was talking about missing kids or child safety: now everybody is. I believe that anger can be an agent of positive change if it is challenged correctly. I believe that Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, and Mahatma Gandhi were all driven by anger over the way their constituents were being treated.

Finally, don’t forgive. There are many who say that one cannot move forward until they have forgiven for transgressions or crimes. I believe that forgiveness is way over rated. I also believe that it is presumptuous to forgive someone for crimes committed against someone else. The rape victim can forgive the rapist, because that is her choice. However, the only person who should be able to forgive Arias is Travis Alexander, but unfortunately she took his life in the most savage and unimaginable way possible.

When you get to Hell say hello to Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Tim McVeigh.

Kidnap Super Lotto

Amanda Berry

Amanda Berry

The missing person world so often ends in tragedy and heartbreak. Human remains are delivered to the morgue in body bags, or go uncollected in the wilderness, go undetected in shallow graves, or tossed callously down steep embankments. Perverts are arrested and charged with crimes so heinous that they defy description or understanding. So, when a child who was taken by a sexual predator turns up days, months, or even years later it is a time to rejoice and reflect.

The miracle in Cleveland is akin to the kidnap super-lotto! Amanda, Gina, and Michelle are apparently healthy. All have been released from the hospital; have returned home to their families, or into seclusion, away from the glare of cameras and the probing questions of aggressive reporters. They have expressed their thanks and gratitude, and they have asked for privacy as they attempt to heal from the sadistic torment and torture inflicted upon them at the hands of a despicable monster. We should all honor their wishes, step back and hope that they are able to successfully re-enter a world that rushed past them at breakneck speed.

The defining moment, the one that changed everything for the three young women occurred when Amanda Berry took advantage of her first opportunity to escape the dilapidated hovel on Seymour Avenue. She demonstrated remarkable courage and poise in effecting her desperate and daring escape. Had she failed her prospects would have been grim and terrifying at best. Instead, with the help of hometown hero Charles Ramsey, she was able to say the words that are still reverberating around the world, “I’m Amanda Berry. I’ve been kidnapped and I’ve been missing for ten-years, and I’m here now. Now I’m free!!!”

Amanda found something profound stirring in her soul last Tuesday. She found the will to power. Parents should be talking to their children about how Amanda’s desire to live on her own terms, and not those of her tormentor, catapulted her through the broken door and into the light. He was bigger than her, he was stronger than her, but he lacked her patience, intelligence, and desire.

Midsi Sanchez

Midsi Sanchez

Midsi Sanchez also had the will to power. In 2000, after nearly three days of being chained inside her kidnapper’s car in Northern California, seven-year-old Midsi was able to free herself and make a frantic run for freedom. It was subsequently discovered that he had kidnapped and killed children prior to snatching Midsi off of the street as she walked home from school, so her courage and grace under pressure not only saved her own life, but also the lives of countless future victims.

Elizabeth Shoaf

Elizabeth Shoaf

In 2006, fourteen-year-old Elizabeth Shoaf was kidnapped while walking home from the school bus. She was forced into an underground bunker where she was held prisoner for ten-days. This remarkable teenager outsmarted and outfoxed the creep who took her. Elizabeth directed the authorities to her underground prison. When the kidnapper realized that he was under pursuit by watching the news on a battery-powered television in the bunker he asked Elizabeth for advice. She told him to run away and stepped through the hatch into the light.

Jeanette Tamayo

Jeanette Tamayo

Jeanette Tamayo was only nine-years-old when a sexual predator pummeled her brother and mother and then kidnapped her from her home in 2003. Within two days, she gained his trust, and then convinced him that she had asthma and a contagious disease. When he let her go he didn’t realize that she had taken trinkets with his fingerprints on them. The authorities arrested him hours later.

These cases did not make national headlines, but the stories are huge and parents should be talking to their children about these kids who used intelligence and courage to defeat brute force, fear and intimidation. Because they were able to dig deep down inside these girls beat the devil and earned the right to say, “Now I’m free”!!!

Our Nation

By Collene Campbell

Collene & Gary Campbell

Collene & Gary Campbell

Hi, I’m back home from Washington D.C. and thought you just might like to see one of the many articles regarding our extremely difficult effort to help save lives by balancing our U.S. Justice system.  Sadly, the accused criminals have 23 rights in our U.S. Constitution and their victims have not a single right.  Yes, that means the killers of our only son, Scott and the killers of my only sibling, (the best man at our wedding 61 years ago) auto racing legend, Mickey Thompson and his wonderful wife Trudy. Had not a single right in that great document (American’s U.S. Constitution), while the killers had 23 rights.  Obviously, that is why it took so long to get to and through the trials.  It is not only devastating for the families, it is also a huge tax burden and very bad for the safety of all citizens.

Mickey & Trudy Thompson

Mickey & Trudy Thompson

Gary and I are getting very old (or at least I am) and before we check out, we badly want to leave it a safer country for future generations.  Our three murdered family members should and would be alive if the justice system worked as intended.  The murderers of our family should have all been in prison prior to killing our family and that is pretty much what happens in all homicide cases.  Our forefathers did not intend for evil people to have rights and the hard working good Americans to have NO rights.  However, when the U.S. Constitution was written the victims or their families were in the courts defending themselves.  It was a much different time.

Scott Thompson

Scott Thompson

Please call, write, or email your U.S. Representative (Your Congressman) asking them to sign on to House Joint Resolution 40 (H.J. Res 40), the Victims’ Rights U.S. Constitution Amendment.

If you don’t know who your Congressman is, please look it up or call your city hall.  Please know, we certainly never thought our law abiding family could be devastated by murder however, it can happen to ANYONE.

Please let us know if and when you take the few minutes to notify your Representative asking them to sign on H.J. Res. 40.

This is a huge undertaking and our justice system needs to be brought up to date, which will require two-thirds of the House and the U.S. Senate and then ratification of three-fourths of all the States.

Jessica’s Law in California: Public Safety or Public Peril?

By Anonymous

15-yr-old Alyssa Gomez was murdered by sex offender Gilton Pitri

15-yr-old Alyssa Gomez was murdered by sex offender Gilton Pitri

In November of 2006, 70% of the California electorate voted to pass Proposition 83 (Jessica’s Law).  Two aspects of Proposition 83 included broadening the definition of a Sexually Violent Predator (SVP), and strengthening the SVP civil commitment parameters. Civil commitment provides states with a legal mechanism to confine certain sex offenders in a secure treatment facility if the court determines that they continue to pose a threat to public safety after they have completed their prison sentences.

Jessica’s Law passed by such a wide margin because the public thought that they were getting additional protection from the release of dangerous SVP’s into their communities. Preliminary statistics underscored that the public assessment was correct. The number of referrals for full psychiatric evaluations of potential sex predators skyrocketed in the year after Jessica’s Law was passed. In 2006, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) referred 1,850 potential sexual violent predators to the Department of State Hospitals (DSH) for review. In 2007, the year after Jessica’s Law was enacted; CDCR referred 8,871 cases to DSH. This massive discrepancy in the number of referrals clearly demonstrates that the existing SVP law prior to Jessica’s Law resulted in the release of a large number of potential sexual predators into the community.

So, far so good, but the plot thickens. Though there was an effort at the initial phases following the passage of Jessica’s law to implement it as written by having the inmates undergo two full independent psychiatric/psychological evaluations to determine if they were dangerous sexual predators,  that quickly unraveled. Those running the DSH formulated and executed a plan to dismantle Jessica’s law and succeeded. According to the DSH website, 22,173 sex offenders referred to DSH by the prison for an evaluation were released without the full evaluation as mandated by the law from November, 2006 to July 12, 2010.

DSH instead opted to “paper screen” these cases, meaning a cursory review of paperwork instead of sending the mandated two psychologists or psychiatrists to the prison to conduct a face-to-face evaluation. And, though DSH has been aware that dangerous sex offenders released without the mandated evaluation have committed sex offenses, including rape and murder, the program continues to release dangerous sex offenders to prey upon the public. Despite the California Legislature’s statutory mandate, DSH continues to shirk its legal responsibility to have evaluations conducted by two qualified psychologist and/or psychiatrists. They do so despite full awareness of the horrific consequences: the murder, rape and sodomy of victims, mainly children.

A particularly tragic example is that of 15 year-old Alyssa Gomez. On June 18, 2008, four days after he was released on parole Gilton Pitre after being screened in a level 2 evaluation as not needing the two SVP evaluations, he raped and murdered Alyssa, then put her body near a dumpster.

Why is DSH so invested in releasing sexual predators? The reasons appear to be that of economics and ideology. Economics in that it is cheaper for the State to release sex offenders than incur the cost of full evaluations, court costs and the commitment of dangerous sex offenders in state hospital. Ideology because those who run the SVP program do not appear to believe in the broadening of Jessica’s Law: Nor do they believe that sexual offenders who commit sadistic sexual rapes suffer from a mental disorder; or that a prior pattern of child rape does not suffice for current sexual deviance; or that adult males engaged in sodomizing or orally copulating 12 or 13 year old boys against their will represent a mental disorder.

The Recycling of Criminals Under Realighnment

By Michael Rushford

With the adoption of AB-109 in April 2011, California’s Legislature and Governor Jerry Brown announced that the State would no longer take responsibility for criminals convicted of roughly 500 of what they defined as “low level” felonies, such as assault, spousal abuse, commercial burglary, drug dealing, identity theft, and auto theft.  AB-109 (which the Governor called Public Safety Realignment) prohibits prison sentences for these offenders.  Instead the law requires counties to sentence them to terms in overcrowded local jails, or a combination of jail time and probation, home detention, or a treatment program.  At the same time, criminals released from prison, whose most recent felony was one of these new “low level” crimes, are automatically placed on county probation rather than the more intense supervision under state parole.  This includes criminals whose record of prior crimes includes child kidnapping, child sexual assault, home invasion, and murder.

As a result, repeat felons are being cyclically arrested and released much earlier and with much less supervision than they would have been prior to Realignment.  This continues until they commit a violent or serious crime such as rape, robbery, aggravated assault, or murder, leaving victims permanently scarred and sometimes killed.  Since March of last year, the Sacramento-based Criminal Justice Legal Foundation has been compiling news stories of crimes committed by criminals released under Realignment.  In February, the Foundation also reported on the FBI Preliminary crime statistics for 2012, which showed sharp increases for the first time in over 15 years in all categories of crime in California.

According to San Bernardino County Probation Department Spokesman Chris Condon, the way offenders are classified as non-sexual, non-violent, and non-serious is an issue.  “The most recent offense is taken into consideration for sentencing, not past offenses, which poses a problem all its own . . . “Three out of 10 people coming to us had serious violent felonies prior to their last offense.” 

Jerome DeAvila Raped & Murdered his Grandmother

Jerome DeAvila Raped & Murdered his Grandmother

Sex offender Jerome DeAvila was arrested February 26, 2013, for the rape, robbery, and murder of his 76-year-old grandmother in Stockton.  Her body was found dumped in a wheelbarrow in her backyard.  DeAvila had been in and out of jail about a dozen times over the previous 12 months for parole violations.  His most recent release was on February 20, 2013, after being arrested for violating his parole by not registering as a sex offender.  Despite a 30-day jail sentence, he was released one day after pleading guilty due to a court cap which mandates releases when jails reach their population capacity.  According to the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office, DeAvila was released under AB-109.  Records from the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office indicate that DeAvila was released within 24 hours of being arrested in almost all of his nearly dozen arrests in the past nine months.  San Joaquin County Chief Probation Officer Stephanie James said, “With so many people getting released early, jail is not a meaningful consequence.”

CaptureOn March 17, 2013, 28-year-old Anthony Ibarra was found murdered in Santa Maria.  Eight defendants have been charged with his death.  All six are facing charges of murder, street terrorism, committing murder for a criminal street gang, lying in wait, torture, and kidnapping. The special circumstances associated with this murder make the six offenders eligible for the death penalty. According to the Santa Maria Police Department four of the six charged were on Post-Release Community Supervision under AB-109 at the time of the murder.  Ramon David Maldonado, 37, Reyes Gonzales Jr., 42; Pedro Torres, 54; and David Murillo Maldonado, 55 each have served multiple prison terms and committed numerous parole violations.  Even though all four have a history of firearm offenses and gang activity, only their most recent offenses were considered when they were labeled as non-violent, non-serious, and non-sexual offenders and placed on county supervision.

1869525001385Transient sex offender Jerome Anthony Rogers was arrested for the November 14, 2012, home invasion murder of 76-year-old Mary Beth Blaskey.  According to San Bernardino Police Chief Rob Handy, Rogers’s DNA matches samples taken from the crime scene.  Rogers is also being investigated for the December 2010 murder of Wanda Paulin, 86, and the September 2005 murder of 90-year-old Josephine Kelley.  Rogers’s criminal history includes sodomizing a 14-year-old girl.  Rogers was sentenced to 36 months’ probation late last year for failing to register as a sex offender. 

Michael Anthony Wyatt, a felony sex offender, was arrested on a Clovis high school campus in March.  He was released from Fresno county jail because of overcrowding, a direct result of Realignment. Wyatt was rearrested on March 28 when a concerned parent reported Wyatt walking with two children down a street, which violated his probation.  He was heading toward a field where children were Easter egg hunting.  At the time of Wyatt’s arrest, officers found lubricant and condoms in his possession.  Since June 2012, Wyatt has been arrested and released more than 23 times under AB-109.  Some of these arrests include sexual battery and committing a lewd act.

On April 10, Sergio Ballesteros was arrested for the attempted murder of a man in El Monte.  The victim was stabbed in the neck multiple times but survived. According to El Monte Police Sergeant Ben Lowry, Ballesteros was on Post-Release Community Supervision at the time of the attack.

Over the past year, supporters of Realignment initially told Californians that the law was working to reduce recividism and saving tax dollars.  Later, we were told that compiling news stories about crimes committed by criminals set free due to Realignment was ‘fear mongering’ and that the FBI data, showing that crime was increasing was not conclusive.  Now we are being told that Realignment can succeed but it will take more time.

How many innocent Californians must have their lives ended or seriously damaged until the excuses end and our elected representatives in Sacramento take action to stop this?

Mind of the Psychopath

Eight-year-old murder victim Martin Richard

Eight-year-old murder victim Martin Richard

Yesterday it happened yet again. Evil emerged from the shadows to kill, maim and strike fear into innocent, unsuspecting civilians.

As the source of the evil emerges from the gray dust, more truths will became self-evident. Another nihilistic psychopath with an atrocious history has unleashed his hatred and fury upon mankind. The only thing separating the Marathon bomber from Osama bin Laden or from Polly’s killer is scale. As he lurks in the darkness, he justifies murder and mayhem through twisted reasoning just as bin Laden deftly wielded his considerable powers to convince young men to die in his stead, just as Polly’s killer lurked in shadows waiting for opportune moments to convince little girls that he meant them no harm.

Perhaps an unknown slight inspired the hatred that scarred the finish line in Boston and caused so much death and destruction, just as the mad Arab used religion and inequality to excuse and justify murder, just as Polly’s killer used drugs and alcohol. One thing is certain; they all commit heinous crimes for instant self-gratification, without consideration for the consequences of their actions. Like all psychopaths, they lack conscience and consideration—therefore they have no empathy for the children they murder with impunity.

It is inevitable that given the chance, such men will strike again. They cannot be successfully treated or cured; therefore they cannot be trusted in negotiation or surrender. Hatred finds its own depth when children become viable options for death. The twisted logic of the psychopath predictably asserts his cowardice through his declaration to destroy the future rather than attempting to convert it.

We shake our heads in dismay as we battle this moral depravity by holding our children closer, loving them more, reassuring them constantly, and demonstrating strength and courage through example.

Through this act, society redefines not only its role models, but its heroes as well. Overpaid actors and athletes are replaced by men and women in working class uniforms and stay-at-home moms. When we collectively muster the courage to stare the devil in the eye, we challenge rather than yield to his adversity. Yet our anxieties are not easily alleviated, for the lessons of the Boston Marathon or World Trade Center are stark and vivid: Even the most celebrated sporting event or formidable edifice can be reduced to gray dust in less than a minute.

Terrorism comes in many guises and is predictable only in its depravity. Whether it is the baby killer or the holy warrior, the end result—an unyielding march toward destruction—must be acknowledged and addressed or we become indentured to violence and slaves of fear.

Memorial services will continue to correctly honor the victims of the Marathon massacre as a nation’s gratitude will honor its heroes. Right now a million candles, lit in homage, create beacons of light in the darkness. If we fail to eradicate evil, the candles will flicker out and we will be enveloped in darkness forever more.